(no subject)
Uh, I didn't want to post any more on this, honest, but then I came across this followup article, and the last sentence made me laugh and laugh.
Mallozzi and co executive producer Paul Mullie will write the movie, Sci Fi and MGM said. Mallozzi also said he expected the entire Atlantis cast to be in the movie, plus “a certain gaunt and pallid flowing-locked guest star,” apparently referring to former cast member Amanda Tapping.
(The rest is just sciffi president Howe rambling on about fans being content with getting their "next fix of the Stargate franchise". Ah well.)
Ahem, sosorry... I'll get back to posting fanart ASAP.
(minor casting spoiler for the sga movie... does that count as casting spoiler? Do I need a cut for that?)
Mallozzi and co executive producer Paul Mullie will write the movie, Sci Fi and MGM said. Mallozzi also said he expected the entire Atlantis cast to be in the movie, plus “a certain gaunt and pallid flowing-locked guest star,” apparently referring to former cast member Amanda Tapping.
(The rest is just sciffi president Howe rambling on about fans being content with getting their "next fix of the Stargate franchise". Ah well.)
Ahem, sosorry... I'll get back to posting fanart ASAP.
(minor casting spoiler for the sga movie... does that count as casting spoiler? Do I need a cut for that?)
no subject
IAWTC!!!!!1!!!
no subject
Say, is the pallid guest star a casting spoiler? I belatedly put it behind a cut to be on the safe side...
no subject
But yes, this interview's even more ridiculous than the previous ones. And that's saying a lot, considering it involves the Stargate geek squad.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Well, first I have to find the time to finish the one I'm working on. I'd only need two or three days, but there's always something that gets in the way. And I still have to do my taxes by the end of the month. >_<
no subject
I get so livid when I read these articles. "Rising production cost and the steep decline of the dollar are the reason to discontinue SGA". WTF does that mean? That Stargate Universe in miraculously going to reverse the dollar's decline?
no subject
I read that paragraph several times, trying to figure out what went on in that writer's head. The only explanation I can find is that they skimmed Mallozzi's entry, zoomed in on 'flowing-locked', remembered that Amanda already guest-starred, and copypasted the whole shebang without reading it. In any case, it's possibly the most ridiculous thing I've seen in a while.
Well, except Howe's statement above about the franchise fix. Will they ever get that we're in love with characters, not franchises? Only time will tell.
I get so livid when I read these articles. "Rising production cost and the steep decline of the dollar are the reason to discontinue SGA". WTF does that mean? That Stargate Universe in miraculously going to reverse the dollar's decline?
Well, I figure the young and desperate explorers will be played by young and desperate actors. Cheaper to sack the established cast and start over with newbies, maybe. blechh.
Still might bite them in the ass, considering they're discarding a show with an established fanbase and sound ratings for something that may very well tank.
no subject
And then to add insult to injury and call the current fanbase "slightly too old" for the Stargate franchise - I have no words for that. Way to alienate your fanbase, Howe.
no subject
Also, what does he mean by "storytelling that is more for the late 2000s than it is for the 1990s"? What an insult to SGA and to the writers of the show, who have given us some amazing and, thankyouverymuch, contemporary and relatable characters and storylines! I, personally, don't think I'm going to "relate" better to a younger cast. Ick.
no subject
Ditto. I for one I'm very tired of being told over and over that me and my interests don't count. Have you seen
no subject
That's definitely not Tapping.
Maybe Claudia Black, who is sometimes a bit too lean for my taste.
I watched 'The Shrine' on DVR -- *very* good.
It's a crying shame that the SGA writers couldn't have been producing more stories of that caliber.
It's also a shame that the writers almost certainly won't let Rodney mellow a little (some, not to much!) as the result of his experience -- IRL I don't see how such a thing couldn't, particularly that there are the tapes to see of himself. SGA would go right back to status quo ante.
Maybe McKay just needs a Paxil or Lexapro prescription ;)
Regarding SG-1, I think you will enjoy it, at least the first 3-4 seasons before it started getting more stale. Back then they did know how to do the occasional more character-driven ep and the Wr-- I mean Go'auld ;) storyline wasn't so tired. Somewhere around S5 IMO the characters got more 2D again with the writers less willing to rock the boat with them.
no subject